zai-org / glm family / text-generation

glm-4.6

zai-org/glm-4.6

mit SAFETENSORS 356.8B params Updated 30 Sept 2025
General
79.4
Coding
67.2
Math
70.8
Reasoning
60.2

Normalized 0–100 across indexed models.

PrecisionFormatSizeParamsFile
FP16 / smallestSAFETENSORS705.6 GB—model-00001-of-00092.safetensors

Sizes are file sizes, not peak runtime memory.

SourceTaskRawNormalized
ArenaArenaScore1424.390.5
ZeroEvalAIME202593.993.9
ZeroEvalGPQA81.081.0
ZeroEvalHLE17.217.2
ZeroEvalSWEBenchVerified68.068.0

From the Hugging Face model card

About this model.

GLM-4.6

👋 Join our Discord community.
📖 Check out the GLM-4.6 technical blog, technical report(GLM-4.5), and Zhipu AI technical documentation.
📍 Use GLM-4.6 API services on Z.ai API Platform.
👉 One click to GLM-4.6.

Model Introduction

Compared with GLM-4.5, GLM-4.6 brings several key improvements:

  • Longer context window: The context window has been expanded from 128K to 200K tokens, enabling the model to handle more complex agentic tasks.
  • Superior coding performance: The model achieves higher scores on code benchmarks and demonstrates better real-world performance in applications such as Claude Code、Cline、Roo Code and Kilo Code, including improvements in generating visually polished front-end pages.
  • Advanced reasoning: GLM-4.6 shows a clear improvement in reasoning performance and supports tool use during inference, leading to stronger overall capability.
  • More capable agents: GLM-4.6 exhibits stronger performance in tool using and search-based agents, and integrates more effectively within agent frameworks.
  • Refined writing: Better aligns with human preferences in style and readability, and performs more naturally in role-playing scenarios.

We evaluated GLM-4.6 across eight public benchmarks covering agents, reasoning, and coding. Results show clear gains over GLM-4.5, with GLM-4.6 also holding competitive advantages over leading domestic and international models such as DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Claude Sonnet 4.

bench

Inference

Both GLM-4.5 and GLM-4.6 use the same inference method.

you can check our github for more detail.

Recommended Evaluation Parameters

For general evaluations, we recommend using a sampling temperature of 1.0.

For code-related evaluation tasks (such as LCB), it is further recommended to set:

  • top_p = 0.95
  • top_k = 40

Evaluation

  • For tool-integrated reasoning, please refer to this doc.
  • For search benchmark, we design a specific format for searching toolcall in thinking mode to support search agent, please refer to this. for the detailed template.